Drone Attacks in Counterterrorism
Drones are diminutive, unmanned airplanes that transmit real-time film of stationary and moving targets. These aircrafts have been known to support other activities undertaken by governments such as drug interdictions and hostage release efforts and backing. Drones however, have been known to also combat against terrorists. This is a strategy that may save manpower and prevent endangering harm or deaths to the troops activating the drone.
Drone use in Attacks to Curb Terrorism
Drones are weapons that are utilized in battles and they fire projectiles that have the ability to impose extreme damage. Drones are only allowed by law to be used within combat zones and their use in battlefields alone is the most significant single regulation that governs their utilization. Drone technology was originally utilized by the U.S. in the year 2001 in Afghanistan region (Kolodkin, 2011). Attacks using drones since then have risen significantly in different regions in the globe. Most of these attacks have taken place and targeted individuals or groups linked to terrorism
Drones have been utilized more by the military for target observation and investigation. Today’s drone is a machine or robot that is utilized for assignments believed too risky or inappropriate for human beings. The U.S. is affected most by terrorism attacks, making it to utilize drones in fighting against terrorism. As a result the U.S. has put in place drones that can stay in the sky up to 24 hours and are able to be managed from anywhere in the globe; they can even be operated for lengthened time on their own. Drones have been preferred for terrorism attacks as they spare the lives of civilians depending on the fact that the attacks are carried out in battle restricted regions (Kolodkin, 2011).
The U.S. has utilized drones to undertake objective killings of terrorist operators overseas for example, Iraq, Yemen, Somalia and Afghanistan (Kolodkin, 2011). Drones have been very effective and successful strategy of dealing with terrorism. However, drones have been criticized as being counterproductive, reason being that most individuals killed in the drone attacks have been civilians. Up to now, about 70 drone assaults have been carried out on Pakistanis and have murdered more than 600 lives. Most of those aimed were at Al-Qaeda rebels of typically of Arabs and other alien militants.
The use of drones by the U.S. has come with success because it has led to utilizing more machines than human troops to undertake the attacks. This has led to releasing more manpower and reserves in pursuing terrorists wanted for terrorism acts. This has led to many individuals for example, policymakers, officials and political analysts to say that the approach has illustrated signs of success. The drawdown of multitudes in most of the steady countries such as Iraq, is an element of the reason for the rise in drone hits (Kolodkin, 2011). The military at a time solely relied on these robots to wash out insurgents; maintenance troops in combat and aid shun roadside bombs.
Countries use drones to keep their countries safe from terrorists and terrorism acts that cause damage to property and death of innocent individuals. These countries have every right to use the drone technology and related advancements to keep their people safe. They can utilize the drones and avoid endangering their own troops by physically going into battle and killing the terrorists themselves because this does not guarantee their safety from attacks from the terrorist groups and individuals.
Drone use should be encouraged and used by nations on terrorist and terrorist groups because they need to protect their country and people from any harm but at the same time, I believe this should be undertaken with strict trail and in accordance with the regulation of using drones only in battlefield. This will prevent deaths of innocent individuals who might be caught in the middle of the drone attack carried out in areas that are not specified as battlefields.